تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

ارزیابی خطر پذیری مسیر انتخابی احداث راه آهن حدفاصل اصفهان و اهواز در مقابل زلزله

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه شهید بهشی
2 دانشگاه امیرکبیر
چکیده
زلزله از جمله پدیده هایی است که بیشترین آسیب را به سازه‌ها و شریان‌های حیاتی وارد می‌سازد. براساس گزارشات موجود بخش اعظم خطوط اصلی موجود در شبکه راه آهن کشور ایران در مناطقی با خطر نسبی زیاد زمین لرزه قرار گرفته‌اند. مسیر خطوط ریلی مورد مطالعه بین دو شهر اصفهان و اهواز قرار گرفته است و هنوز احداث نشده است و در مرحله مطالعه است. در سالهای بین 2011-1050، بیش از350 زلزله در محدوده مورد بررسی رخ داده که زلزله سال 1384با بزرگای 8/6 ریشتر بیشترین مقدار را داشته است. همچنین در این محدوده 615 گسل وجود دارد . بنابراین خطر پذیری مسیر انتخابی آن در مقابل زلزله مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. در این پژوهش با استفاده از داده های توپوگرافی ، نقشه های زمین‌شناسی ، تصاویر ماهواره ای IRS LISS III ، آمار و اطلاعات زلزله‌های تاریخی و دستگاهی و روشهای تحلیل واریوگرافی، درون یابی و توابع فازی، پهنه بندی خطر پذیری خطوط ریلی در 4 کلاس بدون خطر، خطر متوسط، خطر زیاد و خطر خیلی زیاد تهیه گردید. نتایج مطالعات نشان داد که دو بازه طولانی و یک بازه کوتاه از خطوط ریلی بر محدوده های با حداکثر خطر پذیری انطباق دارند. بررسی نتایج خاطرنشان ساخت که محدوده مورد مطالعه از نظر توپوگرافی، جنس زمین و سیستم گسله‌ها و درزها و شکستگی‌ها دارای تنوع فوق­العاده‌ای می باشد و این تنوع سبب شده است که آسیب‌های وارده از رخداد زلزله‌ها متفاوت باشد. به بیان دیگر زلزله‌ای با بزرگای ثابت می‌تواند از شدت‌های تخریب متفاوتی در خطوط ریلی اصفهان- اهواز برخوردار باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Risk Assessment of Selected Path Railway between Isfahan and Ahvaz against Earthquake

چکیده English

The earthquake is a natural disaster that damages structure and lifeline and is simply inserted into human artifacts. For this reason the structures and lifeline, earthquake loads shall estimate and in order to provide its design.in Iran earthquake, risk of natural disasters is dominant. It should be noted that Iran in recent years, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 Richter scale or more frequently experienced. Focus most historical and instrumental earthquake along the northern margin of two young belts (Kope-Dagh and Alborz Mountain) and south (Zagros Mountains to the northwest - southeast) is located. The relative risk of different regions in the 2800 earthquake building and Housing Research Center Indicate that is about 73 percent of the main lines of the rail network in the regions with high relative risk and especially the Zagros mountain areas are the greater risk of earthquake. Construction of railway lines between Esfahan and Ahvaz on stage in this research study that evaluated against earthquake risk path it has selected. The research study also Zagros mountain interval passes and bridges, tunnels and numerous curves.

Rail between the two cities Esfahan and Ahvaz is studied. In the years between 1050- 2011, more than 350 earthquakes occurred in the area, the biggest earthquake with a magnitude of 6.8 Richter scale in 1384 had the highest value. In this area there are 615 fault reverse fault Zagros Iran’s biggest fault zones perpendicular to that direction. Distinguishing feature of this exist geomorphologic unit including high Zagross (Lordegan - Brojen), Zagross folded (Baghmalek - Lordeghan) and Khuzestan plain (Ramhormoz - Ahvaz), in addition to different geological units covers. The beginning and end of the range in a wide range of railroad in Ahvaz not consolidate the young sedimentary soils passes, the diversity of geological formations in the Zagros that most of the sedimentary formations have been broken by numerous faults. Based seismic study in the south Zagros bar is located. In this study evaluated the risk period.

The data used in this study are planned rail route Esfahan – Ahvaz scale 1:250000 preparation of the Islamic republic of Iran railway research center, geological maps 1:100000 the geological survey Iran, satellite images IRS LISS III the armed forces geographical organization, historical and device earthquake data geological survey. Thus, in the first stages of investigation historical and device earthquake based on semivariogram model and Kriging interpolation method, historical and device earthquake zones calculated. Fault lines of, geological maps 1:100000 mining and were used; of aster the 30 meter resolution ,slope ,Curvature, Profile, elevation it was prepared; lineaments, rippling unit, land use and vegetation cover of satellite images IRS LISS III it was prepared. For the analysis of variable composition due to the lack of homogeneity in terms of scale, the need to unify them was based on the degree of membership. Then, based on Gaussian fuzzy membership function was adjusted. In this study, sure to select the correct of gamma, merging were the values0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95. Then, were evaluated by Statistical Zone and select suitable gamma.

Obtained seismic zones on the basis of semivariogram model and Kriging interpolation method showed that rail lines in three intervals smaller than 4 Richter scale earthquake is facing. Whereas earthquake greater than 4.5 Richter scale on quaternary alluvial deposits are located, in addition to its range with a maximum magnitude of earthquakes on faults and lineaments as well as difference corresponded to the sudden formation. The case study is Iran’s biggest fault zones and more than 350 earthquakes occurred the 1000 year that adaptation layers fault, earthquakes and also historical earthquakes, indicates active region in terms of earthquake. Using a combination of variables of overlapping functions vegetation cover density, land use, historical earthquakes,4-5 earthquakes, greater than 5 earthquakes, change height level layer, slope, Curvature, Profile, faults and lineaments and drainage density layers; the amount of risk in gamma0.8 earthquake was detected because the results showed that recent gamma have greatest difference between variables and classes risk. Zoning in 4 commodity risk respectively without risk, medium risk, high risk and very high risk classified and two long range and a short interval of railway on the scope of their compliance with the maximum risk.



The results show that in terms of topography, geology and system faults and joints related fractures there are tremendous diversity that diversity causes the damage of the earthquake differently. In other words proved to be highly destructive earthquake with magnitude of this range is different. Most gender diversity in both land and exposed the fault lines pass through the system, is one of the Shareza to Ardekan and other the Ramhormoz to Baghmalek. So magnitude earthquake in rail track will be a lot of changes. The beginning and end of the rail passes of new alluvial sediments lands due to being detached and empty spaces, the near Esfahan and Ahvaz areas are involved in the escalation vulnerability. Deposits range in the vicinity Gandoman and of wheat rail lines Izeh the screw with range of motion will face intensified by the earthquake. There convex reflects of Dizajan to Izeh intensification of earthquake in vulnerable parts of the range. Seismic records of more than 5 Richter scale and shallow depth because of lack of data has little effect the result of risk that need to be considered as evidence of potential risk.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Railway
Earthquake
Esfehan
-Ahvaz Railway
اسماعیلی، مرتضی؛ حمیدرضا حیدری نوقابی. 1390. بررسی تاثیر تحریکات لرزه ای با شتاب اوجهای مختلف در رفتار خطوط ریلی با استفاده از یک مدل عددی سه بعدی، نشریه مهندسی حمل و نقل ، سال سوم ، 2 : 100-87.
شهبازنژاد حسین ؛ عبدالرسول تلوری. 1392. ارزیابی آسیب پذیری حمل و نقل ریلی در برابر زلزله با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی معکوس (IHWP )– مطالعه موردی راه آهن ناحیه زاگرس، پانزدهمین همایش بین المللی خطوط ریلی، تهران ، 29-28 مهرماه 1392.
شیعه، اسماعیل؛ کیومرث حبیبی؛ کمال ترابی . 1389. بررسی آسیب پذیری شهره ا در برابر زلزله با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی معکوس (IHWP) و GIS (مطالعه موردی منطقه 6 شهرداری تهران )، مجموعه مقالات چهارمین کنگره بین المللی جغرافی دانان جهان اسلام(ICIWG,2010).
مهندسین مشاور نقش جهان پارس . 1374. طرح تفصیلی شهر شیراز جلد 6.
علائی طالقانی، محمود. 1388. ژئومورفولوژی ایران، انتشارات قومس، ص 138.
قهرودی تالی، منیژه؛ محمد رضا ثروتی؛ مظفر صرافی؛ خبات درفشی. 1391، ارزیابی ناشی از سیلاب در شهر تهران، فصلنامه علمی امداد و نجات، سال چهارم، شماره 3: 92-79.
مختاری، سمیه. 1385. بررسی سیستم مدیریت بلایای طبیعی و مخاطرات زمین در راه‌آهن، پایان‌نامه دوره کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده مهندسی راه‌آهن، دانشگاه علم وصنعت ایران.
مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهر سازی.1378. استاندارد 2800.
منزوی، مهشید؛ محمد سلیمانی؛ سیمین تولایی؛ اسماعیل چاووشی. 1389. آسیب‌پذیری بافت‌های فرسوده بخش مرگزی شهر تهران در برابر (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 12). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، شماره73: 18- 1.
Chang, Ni-Bin. ; Parvathinathan, G. Breeden, Jeff B. 2008. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill sitting in a fast-growing urban region, Journal of Environmental Management, 87: 139-153.
Kainz, W. 2008. GIS for Hazard Analysis Using Vague Data, Chapter 1: Fuzzy Logic and GIS", Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Austria, 5.
Komac, M. 2005. A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia, geomorphology,74:17-28.
Lee,C.T. 2007. Neuro-Fuzzy-based landslide susceptibility analysis-an example from central western Taiwan, Geophysical Research Abstraccts ,9: 49-68.
Ghafary, A. ; Shtiany, M. 1999. Rescue Operation and Reconstructions in Iran; Disaster Prevention a Management, Volume 8, number 1 MCB, University Press.
Mohammadi, Ladan; Meech John A. 2011. Atmospheric Fuzzy Risk Assessment of Confined Space Entry at Mine Reclamation Sites. Proceedings Tailings and Mine Waste Vancouver, BC, November 6 to 9, 2011.
Murat,E. ;Candan ,G. 2003. Use of fuzzy relation to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide pron erea (west black sea region,turkey), 75:24.
Sabuya. F, M. G. Alves; pinto, W.D. 2006. Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes sing fuzzy logic, Engineering Geology, 14.
UNDP (2004). Human Development Report 2004.
Vanalphen, B.; Stoorvogel, J.J. 2000. A functional approach to soil characterization in support of precision agriculture, soil science society of American Journal, 64: 1706-1713.
Webster, R., Oliver, M., 2001. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. England, Wiley
William, G. Byers, P.E. 2004. Railroad Lifeline Damage in Earthquakes; 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C. Canada .pp No. 324.
Zakeri J.A.2006. Vulnerability of Iranian Rail Way Network from Natural Disasters; Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Railway Engineering Turkey.
Chang, Ni-Bin. ; Parvathinathan, G. Breeden, Jeff B. 2008. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill sitting in a fast-growing urban region, Journal of Environmental Management, 87: 139-153.
Kainz, W. 2008. GIS for Hazard Analysis Using Vague Data, Chapter 1: Fuzzy Logic and GIS", Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Austria, 5.
Komac, M. 2005. A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia, geomorphology,74:17-28.
Lee,C.T. 2007. Neuro-Fuzzy-based landslide susceptibility analysis-an example from central western Taiwan, Geophysical Research Abstraccts ,9: 49-68.
Ghafary, A. ; Shtiany, M. 1999. Rescue Operation and Reconstructions in Iran; Disaster Prevention a Management, Volume 8, number 1 MCB, University Press.
Mohammadi, Ladan; Meech John A. 2011. Atmospheric Fuzzy Risk Assessment of Confined Space Entry at Mine Reclamation Sites. Proceedings Tailings and Mine Waste Vancouver, BC, November 6 to 9, 2011.
Murat,E. ;Candan ,G. 2003. Use of fuzzy relation to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide pron erea (west black sea region,turkey), 75:24.
Sabuya. F, M. G. Alves; pinto, W.D. 2006. Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes sing fuzzy logic, Engineering Geology, 14.
UNDP (2004). Human Development Report 2004.
Vanalphen, B.; Stoorvogel, J.J. 2000. A functional approach to soil characterization in support of precision agriculture, soil science society of American Journal, 64: 1706-1713.
Webster, R., Oliver, M., 2001. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. England, Wiley
William, G. Byers, P.E. 2004. Railroad Lifeline Damage in Earthquakes; 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C. Canada .pp No. 324.
Zakeri J.A.2006. Vulnerability of Iranian Rail Way Network from Natural Disasters; Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Railway Engineering Turkey.