تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

ارزیابی آسیب پذیری کشاورزی در مواجهه با تغییرات اقلیمی (مطالعه موردی: استان گیلان)

نویسندگان
منوچهر فرج زاده اصل 1
زهرا کاظم نژاد 2
رضا برنا 3
1 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 دانشگاه پیام نور
3 دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات
10.29252/jsaeh.5.4.89
چکیده
چکیده

برای 16 شهرستان استان گیلان مورد محاسبه قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش نشان می دهد که برحسب شاخص CVI بیشترین آسیب پذیری برای شهرستان تالش (66/99) ، در مؤلفه Mبیشترین آسیب پذیری برای رودبار (21/97) ، در مؤلفه Aو کمترین برای بندر انزلی (21/2)بیشترین آسیب پذیری برای شفت (66/66) ، در مؤلفه U و کمترین برای آستارا (92/28)بیشترین آسیب پذیری برای تالش (49/76) و در مؤلفه Gو کمترین آسیب پذیری برای سیاهکل (24/23) <span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: " b="" nazanin";="" font-size:="" 10pt;="" mso-bidi-language:="" fa;="" mso-ascii-font-family:="" "times="" new="" roman";="" mso-hansi-font-family:="" roman";"="" lang="FA">گزارش شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
واژگان کلیدی: گیلان
شاخص آسیب پذیری
CVI
کشاورزی
تغییر اقلیم

عنوان مقاله English

Assessing vulnerability of agriculture in the face of climate change (Case Study: Gilan Province)

نویسندگان English

manouchehr Farajzadeh 1
zahra kazemnezhad 2
reza borna 3
1 tarbiat modarres
2 pnu
3 srbiau
چکیده English

Abstract

Climate change in one area has severe impacts on water resources and, consequently, agriculture in that area. Therefore, studying the extent of the vulnerability of regions to adopting policies to reduce or adapt to new conditions is of particular importance. One of the methods for assessing the extent of damage to agricultural activities is the calculation of the vulnerability index. In this study, with the aim of assessing agricultural vulnerability to climate change, The CVI index was calculated for 16 cities in Guilan province.

The results showed that the cities of Rasht (61.58) and Talesh (55.21) had the highest vulnerability and, accordingly, had the least adaptive power to climate change compared to other cities. And Langrood County (29.51) has the lowest number of vulnerabilities. The average value of the calculated index is 40.42 in Guilan province. In component R, the most vulnerable were Talesh (99.66) and lowest for Lahijan (2.27), In component M, the highest vulnerability was for Rudbar (97.21) and the lowest for Talesh (24.30), In component A, the most vulnerable were Rasht (89.99) and the lowest for Anzali (2.21), In component C, the most vulnerable were Shaft (66.66) and lowest for Anzali (1.89), In component U, the most vulnerable were Rasht (67.55) and the lowest for Astara (28.92), In component E, the highest vulnerability was for Talesh (76.49) and lowest for Lahijan (22.69), In component G, the most vulnerable was reported to Rasht (53.05) and the lowest vulnerability was reported for Sunnelk (23.24).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Key words: Gilan
Vulnerability Index
CVI
Agriculture
Climate Change
16. Berry, P. M., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Harrison, P. A., & Audsley, E. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(2), 189–204.
17. Burck, J., Marten, F., Bals, C. 2016. T.he Climate Change Performance Index, Dietmar Putscher, Cologne, www.germanwatch.org/en/ccpi.
18. Fussel, HM. (2007). Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change. 17(2):155–167.
19. Guillaumont, P. 2009. An Economic Vulnerability Index: Its Design and Use for International Development Policy, Oxford Devel. Study, 37(3): 193-227.
20. Guillaumont, P., Simonet, C. 2011. To what extent are African countries made vulnerable to climate change? Lessons from a new indicator of physical vulnerability to climate change”, Ferdi Working Paper.
21. Guillaumont, p. 2015. Measuring vulnerability to climate change to allocate funds for adaptation, Joint Research Center Seminar, Bruxelles.
22. Haghani, S., Leroy, S.A.G., Wesselingh, F. and Rose, N., (2016), Rapid evolution of coastal lagoons in response to human interference under rapid sea level change: A south Caspian Sea case study, Quaternary International, Vol.408, p.93-112.
23. Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L. H., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson A. M. and Wolfe, D. (2011). Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production. Agronomy, 103: 351-370.
24. Kaushik, and Sharama, K. (2015). Climate change and rural livelihoods-adaptation and vulnerability in Rajetan. Global NEST, 17(1):41-49.
25. Kelly, P.M. and Adger, W.N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climate change. 47:325-352.
26. Knox, J.W., Rodriguez Diaz, J. A., Nixon, D. J., and Mkhwanazi, M. (2010). Apreliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in Swaziland. Agricultural systems, 103 (2), 63-72
27. Kosarev A., (2005), Physico-Geographical Conditions of the Caspian sea, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Vol.5, p.5-31.
28. Lazarus, Naomi, W. (2011). Coping Capacities and Rural Livelihoods: Challenges to Community Risk Management in Southern Sri Lanka, Applied Geography, 31(1):20-34.
29. Li X., Takahashi T., Suzuki N., and Kaiser H.M. (2011). The impact of climate change on maize yields in the United States and China. Agricultural System, 104: 348-353.
30. Nguyen, T. T. X., Bonetti, J., Rogers, K., & Woodroffe, C. D. (2016). Indicator-based assessment of climate-change impacts on coasts: A review of concepts, methodological approaches and vulnerability indices. Ocean & Coastal Management, 123, 18–43.
31. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change (2007). Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. Panin G.N., (2007), Caspian Sea Level Fluctuations as a consequence of regional Climatic Change, Humburg, p.216-219.
33. Pytric, R., Frank, E., Alfons, O.L., and Rik, L., (2010), Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: The importance of farm level responses, European Journal of Agronomy, 32, Issue 1: 91-102.
34. Shengcai, T., Yinlong, X., Ke, L., Jie, P., & Shiwei, G. (2012). Research progress in agriculturalvulnerability to climate change. Advances in Climate Change Research, no. 4, 203-210.
35. Sullivan, C. A., Meigh, J. R. and Giacomello, A. M. (2003) “The Water Poverty Index: development and application at the community scale.” Natural Resources Forum, 27(3), 189-199.
36. Sullivan, C. and Meigh, J. (2005). “Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: the example of the Climate Vulnerability Index.” Water Science and Technology, 51(5), 69-78.
37. Sullivan, C. A. and Huntingford, C. (2009). “Water resources, climate change and human vulnerability.” 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009.
38. Traynham, L., Palmer, R., and Polebitski, A. (2011). Impacts of future climate conditions and forecasted population growth on water supply systems in the Puget soundregion. Water resources planning and management, 137(4), 318-326.
39. Wilson, G. A. (2012). Geoforum Community resilience, globalization, and transitional pathways of decision-making. Geoforum, 43(6), 1218–1231.
40. Zhang, H.L., X. Zhao, X. G. Yin, S.L. Liu, J.F. Xue, M. Wang, C. Pu and F. Chen, (2015). Challenges and adaptations of farming to climate change in the North China Plain. Climatic Change, 129 (1): 213-224.