تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل همگنی داده‌های دما و بارش در ایران با رویکرد اقلیمی

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه تهران
2 سازمان هواشناسی
چکیده
در دسترس بودن داده سالم و قابل اعتماد در مطالعات اقلیمی مهم بوده و استفاده از داده های اشتباه اولین مخاطره در تحلیل مخاطرات طبیعی خواهد بود. در این مطالعه همگنی سری‌های زمانی میانگین سالانه‌ی دمای کمینه، بیشینه و بارش 36 ایستگاه همدید کشور در 6 طبقه اقلیمی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. آزمون‌های نرمال استاندارد، پتی، انحراف تجمعی و راستی آزمایی ورسلی برای تشخیص ناهمگنی داده‌ها انتخاب شدند. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که % 5/91 و % 5/88 از داده های کمینه و بیشینه دما در طبقه غیر همگن قرار گرفته اند. اگر چه داده های دمای کمینه ایستگاه های هواشناسی اصفهان، سقز، و گرگان و داده های دمای بیشینه ایستگاه های بندر انزلی، شهر کرد، کاشان و سقز دارای شرایط همگن با سطح معنی داری 5 درص بودند. درخصوص داده های بارش، هر چهار آزمون، همگنی 28 ایستگاه را نشان دادند. ولی داده های بارش ایستگاه های بیرجند، کرمان، کرمانشاه، سقز، سنندج و تبریز ناهمگن تشخیص داده شدند. نتایج نشان داد که سال شروع تغییرات دمای بیشینه، در اکثر ایستگاه‌ها سال 1998 بوده ولی در خصوص دمای کمینه و بارش شروع تغییرات در ایستگاه های مختلف، متفاوت بود. از نکات قابل توجه این مطالعه بایستی به کاهش 80 تا 150 میلی متری بارش در ایستگاه های غرب و شمال غرب مانند تبریز، سنندج، سقز و کرمانشاه و همچنین 25 تا 45 میلی متری در ایستگاه های بیرجند، زابل و کرمان اشاره نمود. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که نوع اقلیم در کاربرد نوع آزمون همگنی تاثیری نداشته و هر یک از آزمون های همگنی می تواند در هر اقلیمی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Assessing the Homogeneity of Temperature and Precipitation Data in Iran with Climatic Approach

نویسندگان English

Saeed Bazgeer 1
Faezeh Abbasi 1
Ebrahim Asadi Oskoue 2
Masoud Haghighat 2
Parviz Rezazadeh 2
1 University of Tehran
2 Iran Meteorological Organization
چکیده English

Assessing the Homogeneity of Temperature and Precipitation Data in Iran with Climatic Approach



Extended Abstract:

Qualitative evaluation and validation of atmospheric parameters such as precipitation and temperature are the most important condition for statistical analysis in climatic and hydrological researches. In addition, the meteorological and climatological data have a crucial role in transportation, agriculture, urbanization and health services. Therefore, it is clear that using wrong data source for atmospheric investigations is the first hazard in natural hazards analysis. This study aimed to investigate the homogenization of minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation data for 36 weather stations over different climatic classes in Iran. The Standard Normal Homogeneity Test (SNHT), (Alexanderson and Moberg, 1997), Pettit test (Pettit, 1979), Cumulative Deviation test (Buishand, 1982) and Worsley’s Likelihood Ratio test (Worsley, 1979) were carried out to study homogenization of minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation data (1966-2015). The results revealed that 91.5 % and 88.5 % of minimum and maximum temperatures data, respectively, were in non-homogenized category. Although, Isfahan, Saghez and Gorgan for minimum temperature and Bandar-e Anzali, Sharekord, Kashan and Saghez for maximum temperature showed a homogenized condition with 5 % level of significance. The results showed most of the weather stations (28 out of 36 stations) had homogenized precipitation data. Even though, seven stations including Birjandd, Kerman, Kermanshah, Saghez, Sanandaj and Tabriz had homogenized precipitation data. The Urmia weather station was in doubtful class. That is precipitation data of Urmia weather station were homogenized by two tests results and were non-homogenized with other two tests of homogenization. The spatial distribution of trend variations of minimum temperature average was between -2.8 to 2.8 degree Celsius over the country. Moreover, maximum and minimum variations of minimum temperature occurred in northeast and northwest of the country, respectively. There were a significantly increasing trend (p<0.01) in most of the regions. The results also indicated that the significant variations happened for maximum temperature in most of the weather stations, mainly in northern half of the country. The minimum temperature jump was mostly found in 1985, 1994 and 1998 years during the study period (1966-2015). The maximum variations of minimum temperature were in Mashhad, Shahroud, Ahvaz, Yazd and Semnan weather stations with 2.8, 2.3, 2.2, 2 and 2 degrees Celsius, respectively, jump for above mentioned years during 1966-2015. In addition, the minimum change in minimum temperature was occurred in Birjand, Urmia and Bandar Abbas with a jump of 0.6 degrees Celsius. It should be mentioned that, unlike other stations, the Khorramabad (Lorestan Province) and Fasa (Fars Province) had a decreasing trend for minimum temperature. It changed from 10.3 to 8.3 and from 11.8 to 10.2 degrees Celsius in Khorramabad and Fasa, respectively. The results showed that the commencement of maximum temperature jump for most of the weather stations happened in 1998 with 1.1 degrees’ Celsius change. According to our study, a remarkable decrease in precipitation data was occurred in west and northwest of the country. There was a depletion of 80 to 150 millimeters from 1998 in Tabriz, Sanandaj, Saghez and Kermanshah weather stations during study period (1966-2015). Besides, 25 to 45 millimeters reduction in precipitation was found in south and southeast of the Country which has arid climate including Birjand (South Khorasan Province), Zabol (Sistan and Baluchestan Province) and Kerman. It was revealed that the variations of minimum temperature were larger than maximum temperature which was in agreement with results obtained by Rafati and Karimi, 2018. The results showed that the start of increasing maximum temperature in most of the weather stations was in 1998. It could be due to increasing the global temperature which is in accordance with results found by Steirou and Koutsoyiannis, 2012. The results revealed that about 80 % of precipitation data of weather stations were homogenized. These results were in agreement with results obtained by Hosseinzadeh Talaee et al., 2013. The results indicated that tests of homogenization for minimum and maximum temperatures and precipitation data could use in different climate over the country. Therefore, it could not allocate a single test to a particular climate type. In conclusion, it should be noted that before any analysis pertaining to environmental hazards, the calibration and maintenance of the weather instruments should be carried out periodically. In addition, the metadata and station history for relocation of the weather station should be checked. The relocation can create great changes in meteorological parameters due to elevation, latitude, longitude and land use/land cover differences between two sites.



Key Words: Homogeneity tests, Climate Data, Weather Station, Metadata




کلیدواژه‌ها English

Homogeneity tests
Climate Data
Weather Station
Metadata
پیشگاه ‌هادیان، پدرام؛ اقبال احسانزاده و رامتین معینی.1395. مقایسه عملکرد روش‌های مختلف در بررسی روند تغییرات متغیرهای اقلیمی ( حوضه سد سفیدرود). تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، 12: 66-49.
جهانگیری، زهره و فاطمه رحیمزاده.1384. ضرورت قابل اعتماد بودن اطلاعات هواشناسی در مسائل اقلیم و تغییراقلیم. نیوار، 57-56: 105-91.
خورشیددوست، علی محمد؛ علی اکبر رسولی؛ علی سلاجقه و مجتبی نساجی زواره. 1395. ارزیابی همگنی سری های زمانی دمای بیشینه و کمینه سالانه و فصلی (مطالعه موردی، ناحیه خزر). نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی، 57: 149-133.
دارند، محمد. 1393. واکاوی تغییرات مقادیر حدی بارش و دما در ارومیه به عنوان نشانههایی از تغییر اقلیم. پژوهش‌های حفاظت آب و خاک، 21: 30-1.
سازمان هواشناسی کشور (1392). گزارش طرح توسعه هواشناسی کاربردی (تهک)، شماره 1، هواشناسی کشاورزی.
عباسی، فائزه. 1393. ارزیابی سهم تغییر اقلیم بر کاهش تراز آب دریاچه ارومیه. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران.
عزیزی، قاسم؛ سارا نظیف و فائزه عباسی. 1396. ارزیابی سهم اقلیم بر کاهش تراز آب دریاچه ارومیه. فصل نامه مطالعات میان رشته ای در علوم انسانی، 36: 21-1.
علیزاده، امین. 1393. اصول هیدرولوژی کاربردی، چاپ سی و هشتم. انتشارات دانشگاه امام رضا (ع)، مشهد.
قاجارنیا، نوید؛ عبدالمجید لیاقت و پیمان دانش کار آراسته. 1394. صحت‌سنجی داده‌های بارندگی ایستگاه‌های غیرثبات سازمان هواشناسی و تماب در حوضه آبریز دریاچه ارومیه. حفاظت منابع آب و خاک، 4: 109-91.
مدرسی، فرشته؛ شهاب عراقی‌نژاد؛ کیومرث ابراهیمی و مجید خلقی. 1389. بررسی منطقه‌ای پدیده تغییراقلیم با استفاده از آزمون‌های آماری ( مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبریز گرگانرود- قره‌سو). نشریه آب و خاک، 24: 489-476.
Aguilar, E.; I. Auer, M. Brunet, T. C. Peterson, and J. Wieringa. 2003. Guidelines on climate metadata and homogenization. World Climate Programme Data and Monitoring WCDMP-No. 53, WMO-TD No. 1186. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.
Akinsanola, A. A.; and K. O. Ogunjobi. 2017. Recent homogeneity analysis and long-term spatio-temporal rainfall trends in Nigeria. Theoretical and applied climatology, 128: 275-289.
Arikan, B. B.; and E. Kahya. 2017. Homogeneity revisited: analysis of updated precipitation series in Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 1-2: 1-10.
Buishand, T.A. 1982. Some methods for testing the homogeneity of rainfall records. Journal of Hydrology, 58: 11-27.
Costa, A. C.; and A. Soares. 2009. Homogenization of climate data: review and new perspectives using geostatistics. Mathematical Geosciences, 41: 291-305.
Hallegatte, S. 2012. "A cost effective solution to reduce disaster losses in developing countries: Hydrometeorological Services, Early Warning, and Evacuation." Policy Research Working Paper 6058, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Hosseinzadeh Talaee, P.; M. Kouchakzadeh, and B. Shifteh Some’e. 2013. Homogeneity Analysis of Precipitation Series in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 118: 297-305.
Mamara, A.; A. A. Argiriou, and M. Anadranistakis. 2014. Detection and correction of inhomogeneities in Greek climate temperature series. International Journal of Climatology, 34: 3024-3043.
Marcolini, G.; A. Bellin, and G. Chiogna. 2017. Performance of the Standard Normal Homogeneity Test for the homogenization of mean seasonal snow depth time series. International Journal of Climatology, 37: 1267-1277.
Rahimzadeh, F.; A. Asgari, and E. Fattahi. 2009. Variability of extreme temperature and precipitation in Iran during recent decades. International Journal of Climatology, 29: 329-343.
Rahimzadeh, F.; and M. Nassaji Zavareh. 2014. Effects of adjustment for non‐climatic discontinuities on determination of temperature trends and variability over Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 34: 2079-2096.
Ribeiro, S.; J. Caineta, and A. C. Costa. 2016. Review and discussion of homogenisation methods for climate data. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 94: 167-179.
Sahin, S.; and H. K. Cigizoglu. 2010. Homogeneity analysis of Turkish meteorological data set. Hydrological Processes, 24: 981-992.
Steirou, E.; and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2012. Investigation of methods for hydroclimatic data homogenization. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14: 956-1
Wijngaard, J. B.; A. K. Tank, and G. P. Können. 2003. Homogeneity of 20th century European daily temperature and precipitation series. International Journal of Climatology, 23: 679-692.
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2017. Climate information for disaster risk reduction, Disaster risk reduction program. Communications and public affairs office, WMO Fact Sheets.
Worsley, K. J. 1979. On the likelihood ratio test for a shift in location of normal populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74: 365-367.
Zhang, L.; G. Y. Ren, Y. Y. Ren, A. Y. Zhang, Z. Y. Chu, and Y. Q. Zhou. 2014. Effect of data homogenization on estimate of temperature trend: a case of Huairou station in Beijing Municipality. Theoretical and applied climatology, 115: 365-373.