تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

پهنه بندی نقشه حساسیت سیل گیری با استفاده از ارزیابی بین روش نسبت فراوانی و وزن شواهد در استان کرمانشاه

نویسندگان
1 دانشکده علوم جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشگاه اصفهان
2 دانشکده جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان
چکیده
سیل به عنوان یکی از مخرب ترین بلایای طبیعی با عواقب اجتماعی و اقتصادی و زیست محیطی است. برای جلوگیری از هرگونه خسارت ناشی از سیل تهیه نقشه حساسیت به وقوع سیل نخستین گام در مدیریت سیلاب است .هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی مناطق حساس به سیل گیری با استفاده از ارزیابی دو مدل نسبت فراوانی (FR) و وزن شواهد (WofE) در استان کرمانشاه می باشد. ابتدا موقعیت 146 نقطه سیل گیر در منطقه تهیه گردید. از این تعداد، 102 نقطه (70٪) به طور تصادفی به عنوان داده های اصلی برای واسنجی و باقی مانده، تعداد 44 نقطه (30٪) برای مقاصد اعتبارسنجی استفاده شد. در مرحله بعدی 11 فاکتور موثر بر وقوع سیل شامل زمین شناسی، کاربری اراضی، فاصله از رودخانه ها، تراکم زهکشی، شیب، جهت شیب، انحنای زمین، شاخص رطوبت توپوگرافی (TWI)، طبقات ارتفاعی و میانگین بارندگی مشخص گردید. نقشه رقومی تمامی پارامترها با استفاده از نرم افزارArc GIS 10.2 با فرمت رستری تهیه شدند. سپس احتمال رخداد سیل برای هر کلاس از هر پارامتر محاسبه گردید و در نهایت وزن های به دست آمده برای هر کلاس در سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) در لایه های مربوطه اعمال گردید. نقشه احتمال سیل منطقه مورد مطالعه تهیه گردید. در ادامه، برای اطمینان از صحت نقشه تهیه شده از منحنی (ROC) استفاده شد. نتایج نهایی نشان داد که مدل FR(89/85 درصد) و مدل WofE (20/83 درصد) نتایج مشابه و معقولی دارند. بنابراین، نقشه های حساسیت سیل می تواند برای محققان، شرکت سهامی آب منطقه ای غرب، وزارت نیرو، جهاد کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان جهت کاهش خسارت مفید و ضروری باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Classification map of the sensitivity of flooding using the method of assessment frequency and weight of evidence in the Kermanshah Province

نویسندگان English

Mozhgan Entezari 1
Tahere Jalilian 1
Javad Darvishi Khatooni 2
1 Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, Isfahan University, Iran
2 Sistan and blouchestan University, Iran
چکیده English

Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weight of evidence technique: a case study of Kermanshah Province



abstract

Flood is considered as one of the most destructive natural disasters worldwide, because of claiming a large number of lives and incurring extensive damage to the property, disrupting social fabric, paralyzing transportation systems, and threatening natural ecosystems. Flood is one of the most devastating natural disasters causing massive damages to natural and man-made features Flood is a major threet to human life (injure or death of man and animal life), properties (agricultural area, yield production, building and homes) and infrastructures (bridges, roads, railways, urban infrastructures). The damage thet can occur due to such disaster leads to huge economic loss and bring pathogens into urban environments thet causes microbial development and diseases Therefore, the assessment and regionalization of flood disaster risks are becoming increasingly important and urgent. Although it is a very difficult task to prevent floods, we can predict and compensate for the disaster. To predict the probability of a flood, an essential step is to map flood susceptibility.

The methodology of the current research is includes the following steps:

Flood inventory mapping;

Determination of flood-conditioning factors;

Modeling flood susceptibility and its validations.

Et first , 146 flood locations were identified in the study area. Of these, 102 (70%) points were randomly selected as training data and the remaining 44 points (30%) cases were used for the validation purposes. In the next step 1 flood-conditioning factors were prepared including geology, landuse , distance from river , soil , slope angle, plan curvature, topographic wetness index, Drainage density elevation, rainfall. Then, the probability of the flood occurring for each class of parameters was calculated. Et the end, the obtained weights for each class in the Geographical Information System (GIS) were applied to the corresponding layer and flood risk map of th studied region was prepared. Subsequently, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn for produced flood susceptibility maps.

To determine the level of correlation between flood locations and conditioning factors, the FR

method was used. The results of spatial relationship between the flood location and the conditioning factors using FR model is shown in Table 2. In general, the FR value of 1 indicates

an average correlation between flood locations and effective factors. If the FR value would be larger than 1, there is a high correlation, and a lower correlation equals to the FR value lower than 1.

The analysis of FR for the relationship between flood location and lithology units indicates thet Cenozoic group has the highest FR value. In the case of land-use, it can be seen thet the residential areas and agriculture land-use have values. One of the most important factors affecting the flood is distance from the river. The results showed thet the class of >500 m FR was the most effective one. The analysis of FR for the relationship between flood location and slope angle indicate thet class 0-6. 1 has the highest FR value. In the case of slope aspect, flood event is most abundant on flet and East facing slopes According to the analysis of FR for the relationship between flood location and plan curvature, flet shape has the highest FR value., A flet shape retains surface run-off for a longer period especially during heavy rainfall . Flood locations are concentrated in areas with a TWI >6. 8 drainage density > 4. 6 km/km2 and altitude classes of 1200 m. In the soil layer, the tallest weight is from the earth with a small transformation of gravel. Finally, the maximum weight is the maximum rainfall.

In this study, all parameters of WofE model were calculated for each conditioning factor. In the lithology unit, the Cenozoic class has the highest flood susceptibility. Among the different land-use types, agriculture categories had the highest values . The distance from the river from 0 to 1000 m indicated positive influence in flooding, while the areas more than 1000 m or far from the river represented the negative correlation with flood occurrence. In the soil layer, clayey soil and tuberous soil had the highest weight. The analysis of WofE for the relationship between flood occurrence and slope angle indicated thet slope angle from 0 to 6. 21 had positive influences in flooding. In the case of slope aspect and plan curvature, flet area had a strong positive correlation with flood occurrence. Effectiveness increases wit increasing TWI classes. The results of drainage density indicate thet areas with higher drainage densities are more susceptible to flood occurrence. By increasing the height of the flooding reduced sensitivity classes. byn flooding rainfall and flood events increased with increasing rainfall.



The prediction accuracy and quality of the development model were examined using the area under the curve (AUC). Specifically, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to examine the basis of the assessment is true and false positive rates . So the results showed thet based on the area under the curve, the FR and WofE models show similar results and can be used as a simple tool for verifying the map prepared for flood sensitivity and reducing its future risks.

Floods are the most damaging catastrophic phenomena in the worldwide. Therefore, flood susceptibility mapping is necessary for integrated watershed management in order to have sustainable development. In this study, flood susceptibility zones have been identified using FR and WofE methods. Et first step, a flood inventory map containing 146 flood locations was prepared in the kermanshah Province using documentary sources of Iranian Water Resources Department and field surveys. Then, eleven data layers (lithology, landuse, distance from rivers, soil texture, slope angle, slope aspect, plan curvature, topographic wetness index, drainage density, and altitude) were derived from the spatial database. Using the mentioned conditioning factors, flood susceptibility maps were produced from map index calculated using FR and WofE models, and the results were plotted in ArcGIS. Finally, the AUC-ROC curves using validation dataset were prepared for the two models to test their accuracy. For this reason, of 146 identified flood locations, 102 (70%) cases were used as training data and the remaining 44(30%) was used for validation. The validation of results indicated thet the FR and WofE models had almost similar and reasonable results in the study area. Based on the overall assessments, the proposed approaches in this study were concluded as objective and applicable. The scientific information derived from the present study can assist governments, planners, and engineers to perform proper actions in order to prevent and mitigate the flood occurrence in the future.



Key words: Flood susceptibility mapping, validation, method of frequency, weight of evidence, GIS- Kermanshah


کلیدواژه‌ها English

classification
Validation
method of frequency
weight of evidence
GIS
Bronstert, A. 2003. Floods and climate change: interactions and impacts. Risk Anal 23:545–557 Bubeck P, Botzen W, Aerts J (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal 32:1481–149.
Bonham-Carter GF. 1991. Integration of geoscientific data using GIS. In: Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, Maguire DJ, editors. Geographic information systems: principle and applications. London: Longdom; p. 171–184.
Bonham-Carter GF. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. In: Bonham-Carter F, editor. Computer methods in the geosciences. Oxford: Pergamon; p. 398.
Cevik, E; T. Topal. 2003. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol. 44:949–962.
Davoodi Moghaddam, D; M. Rezaei, HR. Pourghasemi, ZS. Pourtaghie, B. Pradhan. 2015. Groundwater spring potential mapping using bivariate statistical model and GIS in the Taleghan watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci. 8:913–929.
Devkota KC; AD, Regmi, HR. Pourghasemi, K, Yoshida, B. Pradhan, IC. Ryu, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 65:135–165.
Feng, CC; Wang YC. 2011. GIScience research challenges for emergency management in southeast Asia. Nat Hazards. 59:597–616.
Greenbaum, D. 1989. Hydrogeological applications of remote sensing in areas of crystalline basement. Proceedings of the groundwater exploration and development in crystalline basement aquifers; Zimbabwe.
Kia, MB; Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor river basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67:251–264
Kjeldsen, TR. 2010. Modelling the impact of urbanization on flood frequency relationships in the UK. Hydrol Res 41:391–405.
Nampak, H; Pradhan B, Manap MA. 2014. Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. J Hydrol 513:283–300.
Nagarajan, R; Roy A, Vinod Kumar R, Mukherjee A, Khire MV. 2000. Landslide hazard susceptibility mapping based on terrain and climatic factors for tropical monsoon regions. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 58:275–287.
Norouzi, G; Taslimi M .2012. The impact of flood damages on production of Iran’s Agricultural Sector. Middle East J Sci Res 12:921–926
Miller, JR; Ritter DF, Kochel RC. 1990. Morphometric assessment of lithologic controls on drainage basin evolution in the Crawford Upland, south-central Indiana. Am J Sci. 290:569–599.
Mohammady, M; Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-ofevidence models. J Asian Earth Sci. 61:221–236.
Ozdemir, A; Altural T. 2013. A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:180–197.
Ohlmacher, GC; Davis JC. 2003. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas. Eng Geol. 69:331–343.
Paron, P; Baldassaree.Gand Shroder.J. 2015, Hydro-Meteorological Hazards,Risks and Disaster ,Elsivier.pages35-64.
Pourghasemi, HR; Mohammady M, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood basin, Iran. Catena. 97:71–84.
Pourghasemi, HR; Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR. 2013. Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci. 6:2351–2365.
Pourghasemi, HR; Moradi HR, Fatemi Aghda SM. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards. 69:749–779
Pourghasemi, HR; Moradi HR, Aghda SMF, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B. 2014. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with probabilistic likelihood ratio and spatial multi-criteria evaluation models (North of Tehran, Iran). Arab J Geosci. 7:1857–1878.
Pourtaghi, ZS; Pourghasemi HR. 2015. GIS-based groundwater spring potential assessment and mapping in the Birjand Township, southern Khorasan Province, Iran. Hydrogeol J. 22:643–662.
Pradhan, B; Buchroithner MF. 2010. Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci.16:107–126.
Pradhan, B; Oh H J, Buchroithner M. 2010. Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 1:199–223.
Pradhan, B; Lee S. 2010. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci. 60:1037–1054.
Pradhan B. 2010. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area estimation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spatial Hydrol. 9:1–18.
Pradhan, B; Mansor S, Pirasteh S, Buchroithner M. 2011. Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int J Remote Sens. 32:4075–4087.
Rahmati, O; Nazari Samani A, Mahdavi M, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2014. Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1668-4.
Rahmati, O; Zeinivand H, Besharat M .2015 Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk.
Schober, B; Hauer C, Habersack H. 2015. A novel assessment of the role of Danube floodplains in flood hazard reduction (FEM method). Nat Hazards. 75:33–50.
Tunusluoglu, M; Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu H, Sonmez H. 2008. Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol. 54:9–22.
Khosravi, K; Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards.
Van Westen, CJ; Rengers N, Soeters R. 2003. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards. 30:399–419.