تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

سطح بندی منطقه ای آسیب پذیری به خشک سالی در استان گلستان

نویسندگان
دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان
چکیده
خشک‌سالییکی از پدیده­های طبیعی است که خسارت­های زیادی را به زندگی انسان و اکوسیستم­های طبیعی وارد می­سازد. به طور کلی خشک­ سالی عبارت است از کمبود بارش باران نسبت به میزان نرمال یا آنچه انتظار می­رود، زمانی که از یک فصل یا یک دوره­ی زمانی طولانی­تر بوده و برای رفع نیازها ناکافی باشد. خشک­سالی موجب وارد آمدن خسارات به بخش کشاورزی می­شود. میزان آسیب­پذیری بخش کشاورزی در هر منطقه به سه عامل میزان در معرض خشکسالی بودن، میزان حساسیت نسبت به خشکسالی و ظرفیت سازگاری با خشکسالی بستگی دارد. این آسیب­ها اثرات منفی زیادی بر زندگی و معیشت کشاورزان می­گذارد. لذا شناسایی مناطق آسیب‌پذیر و سنجش میزان آن با اهمیت تلقی می‌شود. مفهوم آسیب‌پذیری برای اولین بار از سوی اوکیف و همکاران ، به کار گرفته شد. از جمله تعاریف آسیب‌پذیری که به‌طور گسترده‌ای به‌کار رفته، تعریف زیر است: آسیب‌پذیری به ‌طور معمول نشان‌دهنده درجه‌ای از آسیب است که یک سیستم به دلیل مواجه‌شدن با خطر تجربه می‌کند. مدل شناخته ‌شده و تائید شده برای ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری توسط هیئت ﺑﯿﻦ دوﻟﺘﯽارائه ‌شده است. استان گلستان به عنوان یکی از قطب­های مهم کشاورزی وابستگی زیادی به میزان بارش­های سالانه دارد. در اثر نوسانات بارندگی و بروز خشک­سالی در برخی مناطق استان، ﮐﺎﻫﺶ رﻃﻮﺑﺖ ﺧﺎک و ﻫﻮا و در نتیجه ﮐﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﯿـﺪ و ﻋﻤﻠﮑـﺮد ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻت ﮐﺸﺎورزی اتفاق افتاده که موجب آسیب شدید به معیشت خانوارهای کشاورز شده است. بنابراین هدف تحقیق حاضر مقایسه آسیب‌پذیری به خشک­سالی در بین شهرستان­های استان گلستان به تفکیک سه مؤلفه (در معرض قرار گرفتن، حساسیت و سازگاری) است. نخست شاخص‌های مناسب برای سنجش آسیب‌پذیری به خشک‌سالی به تفکیک سه مؤلفه موردنظر شناسایی و داده‌های مربوط به شاخص‌ها جمع‌آوری شد. وزن شاخص‌ها از طریق مدل آنتروپی شانون استخراج و با روش تاپسیس شاخص ترکیبی به تفکیک سه مؤلفه آسیب‌پذیری تدوین شد. نتیجه نهایی شاخص ترکیبی با لایه‌های GIS شهرستان­های استان گلستان تلفیق شد، و سطح آسیب‌پذیری شهرستان­های به تفکیک مؤلفه‌های مورد نظر مشخص شد.نتایج نشان داد که در بعد در معرض قرار گرفتن بندرگز، مراوه­تپه، بندرترکمن به ترتیب در رتبه­های اول تا سوم قرار دارند و در معرض خشک­سالی هستند. شهرستان­های آزادشهر، گالیکش و بندرترکمن به ترتیب در رتبه­های اول تا سوم بیش­ترین میزان حساسیت به خشک­سالی قرار دارند. شهرستان­های گمیشان، گالیکش و مراوه ­تپه به ترتیب بیش­ترین سازگاری را به خشک­سالی دارند. در نهایت نتایج محاسبه شاخص آسیب­پذیری کل نشان داد که شهرستان­های مرواه ­تپه و بندرترکمن آسیب­پذیرترین مناطق نسبت به خشک­سالی در استان گلستان محسوب می­شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Regional leveling of drought vulnerability in Golestan province

نویسندگان English

narges kefayati
khalil ghorbani
Gholam Hossein abdollahzade
Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
چکیده English

Regional leveling of drought vulnerability in Golestan province

Narges Kefayati*1- Khalil Ghorbani2- Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh 3-



1- PhD student of irrigation and drainage, Department of Water Engineering, College Of Water Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,Gorgan,Iran. (Corresponding Author)*

2- Associated Professor, Department of Water Engineering, College Of Water Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resourcesm, Gorgan, Iran.

3- Associated Professor, Department of Agricultural Promotion and Training, Faculty of Agricultural Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources



Abstract

Drought is one of the natural phenomena that causes a lot of damage to human life and natural ecosystems. In general, drought is a lack of rainfall compared to normal or what is expected, when it is longer than a season or a period of time and is insufficient to meet the needs. Drought causes damage to the agricultural sector. The vulnerability of the agricultural sector in each region depends on three factors: the degree of drought exposure, the degree of sensitivity to drought and the capacity to adapt to drought. A review of previous studies indicates the diversity of indicators and methods used to assess vulnerability, which indicates the importance of the issue. Institutions responsible for agricultural management can only manage drought properly if they have the appropriate tools to measure the vulnerability of the agricultural sector to drought. Therefore, the first step in drought studies is to identify vulnerable areas and assess the vulnerability of areas. Vulnerability measurement in geographical dimensions and measurement of indicators by main vulnerability components have received less attention. Based on this, the present study has investigated drought vulnerability in Golestan by scientific method and by combining the three mentioned components and has compared the exposure situation, sensitivity level and level of drought adaptation capacity among the cities of Golestan province. Golestan province as one of the important agricultural hubs is highly dependent on the amount of annual rainfall. Due to fluctuations in rainfall and drought in some parts of the province, there have been 4 outbreaks and as a result, 7-12 and 10 days of drought have occurred, which has caused severe damage to the livelihood of farming families. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare drought vulnerability among cities in Golestan province by three components (exposure, sensitivity and adaptation). First, by reviewing the sources, the effective indicators on drought vulnerability are identified separately by the three components and judged by experts (faculty members of water engineering, agriculture and plant breeding, agricultural extension and education, and agricultural economics and experts of water engineers). 55 appropriate indicators in three main dimensions of vulnerability, namely: a) exposure (14 indicators), b) sensitivity (26 indicators) and c) compatibility (17 indicators) were developed and data related to the indicators were collected. The weights of the indices were extracted by Shannon entropy model and by the TOPSIS method the combined index was compiled separately into three vulnerability components. The final result of the combined index was combined with the GIS layers of the cities of Golestan province, and the level of vulnerability of the cities was determined separately for the desired components. The results showed that in terms of exposure to Bandar-e-Gaz, Bandar-e-Turkmen and Aq Qala are in the first to third ranks, respectively, and are exposed to drought. Azadshahr, Galikesh and Bandar-e-Turkmen counties are in the first to third ranks with the highest sensitivity to drought, respectively. The cities of Gomishan, Galikesh and Maravah Tappeh are the most adapted to drought, respectively. Finally, the results of calculating the total vulnerability index showed that the cities of Marwah Tappeh and Bandar-e-Turkmen are the most vulnerable areas to drought in Golestan province. The findings of this study showed that rainy areas can be more exposed to drought at the same time than other areas and there is no direct relationship between rainfall and drought exposure. This confirms the findings of other studies such as Kramker et al. And O'Brien et al. On the other hand, the findings of this study showed that there is no direct relationship between rainfall and vulnerability to drought and the most rainy areas of a region at the same time can be the most vulnerable to drought. This is in line with the findings of Tanzler et al. And Salvati et al. On the relationship between rainfall and drought vulnerability. Due to the fact that the rainy areas of this province are more exposed to drought than other areas and farmers in these areas have shown a higher degree of sensitivity to drought and are more vulnerable to drought than other areas, it is recommended Measures should be taken to reduce the sensitivity and increase the adaptation capacity of farmers in these areas.



Keywords: Drought, Vulnerability, Exposure, Sensitivity, Compatibility, Regional Leveling

کلیدواژه‌ها English

: Drought
Vulnerability
Exposure
sensitivity
Compatibility
Regional Leveling
Adger, W. N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16: 268-281.
Alnail, M.; L. Jianhua, E. Joshua, S. Elbashierb, and d. Keesstrac. 2018. Assessing drought vulnerability and adaptation among farmers in Gadaref region, Eastern Sudan. Land Use Policy, 70: 402-413.
Aymone Gbetibouo, G.; and C. Ringler. 2009. Mapping the South African farming sector vulnerability to climate change and variability. International Food Policy Research Institute. Discussion Paper 0610.
Brant, S. 2007. Assessing the vulnerability to drought in Ceara, Northeast Brazil. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.4257432/.
Brooks, N.; W. N. Adger and P.M. Kelly. 2005. The Determination of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity at the National Level and the Implications for Adaptation. Global Environmental changes, 15:151-163.
Change, I.P.C.C. 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Agenda, 6(7):333-531.
Chen, J.; Y. Yang. 2011. A fuzzy ANP-based approach to evaluate region agricultural drought risk. Procedia Engineering, 23: 822-827.
Deng, M.; J. Chen, J. Huang, and W. Niu. 2018. Agricultural drought risk evaluation based on an optimized comprehensive index system. Sustainability, 10(10):34-65.
Fussel, H. M. 2007. Vulnerability A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17: 155-167.
Gautier, D.; D. Denis, and B. Locatelli. 2016. Impacts of drought and responses of rural populations in West Africa: a systematic review. WIREs Climate Change.
Guiqina, J.; Y. Fuliang, and Zh.Yong. 2012. An Analysis of Vulnerability to Agricultural Drought in China Using the Expand Grey Relation Analysis Method. International Conference on Modern Hydraulic Engineering, 28: 670-676.
IPCC (International Pannel on Climate Change). Climate change 2001. Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Integovernmental Panel on Climate Change (R.T. Watson and the Core Writing Team, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, USA.
Jiansheng, Wu.; L. Xin, W. Meijuan, P. Jian, and Tu.Yuanjie. 2017. Assessing Agricultural Drought Vulnerability by a VSD Model: A Case Study in Yunnan Province, China. Sustainability, 9: 1-16.
Kapoor, S.; R. K. Ojha. 2006. Vulnerability in Rural Areas: Potential Demand for Microinsurance. International Journal of Rural Management, 2(1): 64-83.
Kazemi Rad, L.; M. Ghamgosar, and M. Haghyghy. 2012. Multi criteria decision making based on TOPSIS method in drought zoning: A case study of Gilan province. World Applied Programming, 2(2): 81-87.
Knutson, C. L. 2008. The role of water conservation in drought planning. Journal of soil and water conservation, 63(5):154-160.
Kromker, D.; F. Eierdanz, and A. Stolberg. 2008. Who is assessing vulnerability to drought. Regional Environmental Change, 8(4):173-185.
Makoka, D. 2008. The impact of drought on household vulnerability: The case of rural Malawi. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA):1-24.
Murthy, C.S.; B. Laxman, M.V.R.S. Sai. 2015. Geospatial analysis of agricultural drought vulnerability using a composite index based on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. International Journal Disaster Risk Reduct, 12:163–171.
Obrien, K.; S. Eriksen, L. P. Nygaard, and A. Schjolden. 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1):73-83.
Panda, A.; 2016. Vulnerability to climate variability and drought among small and marginal farmers: a case study in Odisha. India. Clim, Dev. 1–13.
Piri, H.; V. Rahdari, and S. Maleki. 2013. Study and compare performance of four meteorological drought index in the risk management droughts in Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Journal of Irrigation and water Engineering, 3(11): 96-114.