تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

جغرافیا و پارادایم توسعه پایدار

نویسنده
بهلول علیجانی
دانشگاه خوارزمی
10.52547/jsaeh.8.3.1
چکیده
مجهز شدن انسان به تکنولوژی پیشرفته و جایگزینی فلسفه جبر محیطی با فلسفه انسان گرا در نیمه دوم سده بیستم سبب شد که او به صورت بی رویه و غیر منطقی از منابع زمین بهره برداری کند به طوری که بعد از دهه 1960 مصرف انسان به تدریج بیشتر از تولید سالانه زمین شد. این مساله سبب تخریب منابع زمین و ظهور آلودگی های گوناگون گردید. پیامد دستکاری های غیر منطقی انسان به اندازه ای شدید شد که بزرگترین مخاطره کره زمین یعنی گرمایش جهانی در دهه 1970 اتفاق افتاد و به زغم خیلی از دانشمندان دوره آنتروپوسن آغاز شد. برای چاره جویی این بحران جهانی در سال 1978 مفهوم توسعه پایدار مطرح و تعریف شد. هدف از این مفهوم این بود که مصرف انسان نباید بیشتراز تولید زمین باشد و زایدات انسانی هم نباید بیشتر از توان جذب زمین شود. تا زمین برای همیشه شکوفا و زاینده باقی بماند تا نسل های آینده هم از منابع زمین بهره مند شوند. رشته های علمی زیادی سعی کردند در حیطه توسعه پایدار کار کنند. اما رشته جغرافیا به دلیل ماهیت جامع نگری آن بر سامانه انسان و محیط و داشتن مکان یابی مناسب برای انسان ضمن حفظ پایداری پراکندگی ها در هدف و چشم انداز خود مناسبترین رشته برای مطالعه توسعه پایدار شناخته شده است. جغرافیا این مهم را از طریق انجام مراحل سه گانه تحلیل فضایی، برنامه ریزی فضایی و مدیریت فضایی انجام می دهد. جغرافیدانان برای انجام این کارها باید به بعضی توانایی هایی مانند توان تلفیق تخصص های متعدد جغرافیا و روش های آماری کلاسیک و زمین آمار و تکنیک های سنجش از دور و مدل های پیچیده و کمی مسلطه شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
توسعه پایدار
جغرافیا
جغرافیا و توسعه پایدار
تحلیل فضایی
برنامه ریزی و مدیریت فضایی
پایداری منابع طبیعی

عنوان مقاله English

Geography and sustainable development

نویسنده English

Bohloul Alijani
khu
چکیده English

Geography and the Paradigm of Sustainable Development



Extended Abstract

Geography and sustainable development

The relation between society and environment has gone through different phases. During the years before the World War II, the environmental determinism controlled this relation. However, after the 1950’s the anthropocentrism replaced the environmental determinism and humans began to overuse the nature in such a way that nature lost its sustainability and many hazards and crises occurred. These destructions were so intense and widespread that some researchers compared with the episodes of geologic time and named the era beginning from 1970’s the Anthropocene epoch. During this period, the planetary boundaries were crossed in some areas such climate change, nitrogen cycle and biodiversity. Climate change has created most of other hazards.

To overcome these problems in 1978 the Brandtland report announced the sustainable development as not to spend resources more than the nature’s production capacity and not to pollute the nature more than it can assimilate. In other words, the nature should remain in its sustainable state so that the future generations can live with no limitations. The principles of the sustainable development were defined in the earth summit of Rio in 1992 such as social equity, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. These principles were broken down in 17 goals. The Rio conference asked all countries to achieve the sustainable development goals by 2030.

Methodologically the sustainable development requires integrated multidisciplinary approach to investigate the complex system of human- environment in different temporal and spatial scales to achieve the social equity, economic viability, and environmental sustainability. For this reason, many disciplines such as natural resources, environmental sciences, ecology and geography have contributed to the field. Different data from natural resources, human needs and drivers and environmental changes are required to process in very complicated models. In addition to different variables, the hazards are very important component of the sustainable development research, which also requires multi-aspect complicated approach and models. Spatial dependency is another aspect of sustainable development as it differs from place to place in many characteristics. In brief, from the spatial perspective the sustainable development is an integrated multi-approach research about the human-environment system to establish the sustainability on the earth. All of the related fields should study the sustainable development in collaboration with each other. However, the geography due to its long history of studying the relation between human and environment and its spatial dependency is the best single scientific field which can afford studying the sustainable development. Since the earliest times geography has developed quantitative methods, spatial techniques such as geostatistics, and environmental ethics to conserve the nature and human prosperity. The multi approach and systematic works are the main characteristics of Geography. On the other hand, Geography’s vision of defining the location for human’s activities while saving the nature’s sustainability covers the sustainable development completely. Therefore, geography is the overarching field for the sustainable development and it is the main intention of geographers to research and implement the sustainable development to reduce the environmental hazards and develop the sustainable environment for all the human beings at present and in the future. Geography studies the sustainable development through three steps including spatial analysis, spatial planning, and spatial management. In addition, geographers should learn different skills such remote sensing, multivariate statistics and above all develop a common language between different branches of geography.



Keywords: geography, sustainable development, environmental ethics, human nature relationship, Anthropocene, planetary boundaries, sustainability.


کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geography
sustainable development
environmental ethics
human nature relationship
Anthropocene
planetary boundaries
Sustainability
علیجانی، ب. 1399. اخلاق محیطی و بیماری کرونا. نشریه تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی 7(4): 1-20.
علیجانی، ب. 1398. روش شناسی کمی در جغرافیا. انتشارات سمت، تهران.
علیجانی، ب. 1394. تحلیل فضایی. نشریه تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی 2(3): 1-14.
علیجانی، ب. 1393. مبانی فلسفی مخاطرات محیطی. نشریه تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی 1(1): 1-15.



Ahern, J. ?????????. Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. E-mail: jfa@larp.umass.edu
Almond, R.E.A., Grooten M. and Petersen, T. (Eds). 2020. Living Planet Report - Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. WWF, Gland, Switzerland.
Balteanu, T. And Dogaru, D. 2011. Geographical perspective on human- environment relationships and anthropic pressure indicators. Romanian Journal of Geographers, 55: 69-80.
Basiago, A.D. 1999. Economic, social and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist, 19: 145-161.
Bastian,O. and Z. Lipsky. 2006. Landscape Diagnosis on Different Space and Time Scales – A Challenge for Landscape Planning. Landscape Ecology, 21:359–374. DOI 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1.
Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
Castree, N. 2015. Geography and global change science: Relationships necessary, absent, and possible. Geographical Research, 53 (1):1-15. ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1352
Covello, V.T. and Mumpower,J. 1985. Risk analysis and risk management: an historical perspective. Risk Analysis, 5 (2): 103-120.
Crutzen, P.J. and E.J. Stoermer. 2000. The Anthropocene, IGBP Newsletter, 41: 17-18.
Day, T. 2017. The Contribution of Physical Geographers to Sustainability Research. Sustainability, (9):1-18. doi:10.3390/su9101851
Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96. doi:10.1080/15693430600688831
Eggenberger,M. and M.R. Partidário. 2000. Development of a framework to assist the integration of environmental, social and economic issues in spatial planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,18(3):201-207.
Evers, B. A. (2018) Why adopt the Sustainable Development Goals? The case of multinationals in the Colombian coffee and extractive sector: Master Thesis Erasmus University Rotterdam
FAO/UNEP (1997). Negotiating a Sustainable Future for Land. Structural and Institutional Guidelines for Land Resources Management in the 21st Century. FAO/UNEP, Rome.
Forman, R.T.T., 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Franch-Pardo,I., B.M. Napoletano, G. Bocco, S. Barrasa,D and L. Cancer-Pomar. 2017. The Role of Geographical Landscape Studies for Sustainable Territorial Planning. Sustainability, 9: 2-23. doi:10.3390/su9112123 www.mdpiD
Fu, B. 2020. Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geography and Sustainability, 1:1–7.
Fu,B., Y. Liu , Y. Li , C. Wang, C. Li, W. Jiang, T. Hua, and W. Zhao.2021. The research priorities of Resources and Environmental Sciences. Geography and Sustainability,2:87-94. doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.04.001
Gerten, D., V. Heck, J. Jägermeyr, B. L. Bodirsky, I. Fetzer, M. Jalava, M. Kummu, W. Lucht, J. Rockström, S. Schaphoff, and H. J. Schellnhuber. ????Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability.
Göktepe, O., E. Altın, and M. Kasımoğlu. 2014. A Strategic Environmental Management Model: Salt Lake Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150: 310 – 319
Goudie, A.S. 2017. The integration of human and physical geography revisited. Candian Geographer, 61 (1): 19–27 . DOI: 10.1111/cag.12315
Huang, L., J. Wu, and L. Yan. 2015. Defining and measuring urban sustainability: a review of indicators. Landscape Ecology, 30:1175–1193. DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2
Inglis, J. 2008. Using human-environment theory to investigate human valuing protected area management. PhD. Dissertation, Victoria University, Australia.
Inkpen, R. 2009. Development: Sustainability and physical geography. Key Concepts in Geography: 378–391.
Kattumuri, R. 2018. Sustaining natural resources in a changing environment: evidence, policy and impact, Contemporary Social Science, 13:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2017.1418903
KŐSZEGI, M., BOTTLIK, Z., TELBISZ, T. and MARI, L. 2015. Human-environment
relationships in modern and postmodern geography. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64: 87-99.
Lang, D.J., A. Wiek , M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, C. J. Thomas. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, (Supplement 1):25–43. DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Lewis,S.L.and M. A. Maslin. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542):171-80 DOI: 10.1038/nature14258
Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens Ill. 1972. The limits to growth: a report of the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Meadows, M.E. 2020. Geography Education for Sustainable Development. Geography and Sustainability,1: 88–92. doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.02.001
Mensah, J., & Enu-Kwesi, F. (2018). Implication of environmental sanitation management in the catchment area of Benya Lagoon, Ghana. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. doi:10.1080/ 1943815x.2018.1554591
Mensah. J. 2019. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5:1, 1653531. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Moyer, J.D and S. Hedden. 2020. Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals? World Development, 127 (104749): 1-12. doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104749
Polizos, S. and G. Arabatzis. 2008. Spatial distribution of natural resources and their contribution to regional development in Greece. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 9 (1): 183–199
Qiu, J. 2017. The role of geography in sustainable development. National Science Review, 4: 140–143. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww082
Qu, W., W. Shi, J. Zhang, and T. Liu. 2020. T21 China 2050: A Tool for National Sustainable Development Planning. Geography and Sustainability, 1: 33–46. doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.03.004
Reijnders L. 1999. A normative strategy for sustainable resource choice and recycling. Resources Conservation and Recycling 28: 121-133.

Rockström, J. , Steffen, W. , Noone, K. , Persson, Å. , Chapin, F.S. , Lambin, E.F. , Lenton, T.M. , Scheffer, M. , Folke, C. , Schellnhuber, H.J. , 2009a. A safe operating space for human- ity. Nature 461 (7263), 472–475 .
Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K arlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. Foley. 2009b. Planetary boundaries:exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ Or NATURE|Vol 461|24 September 2009
Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, E. F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P. K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. W. Corell, V. J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, J. A. Foley. 2009a. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263):472-475.
Rockstrom, J., X. Bai, and B. deVries. 2018. Our world and Earth in transition. Global Sustainability, 1: 1-6. doi:10.1017/sus.2018.8.
Segura,S. and B. Pedregal. 2017. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Spatial
Plans: A Spanish Case Study. Sustainability, 9:1-19. doi:10.3390/su9101706
Shaker, R.R. 2015. The spatial distribution of development in Europe and its underlying sustainability correlations. Applied Geography, 63: 304-314. doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.009
Shamsul Haque, M. 2000. Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development: Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment, 5(1):3–21.
Steffen,W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S. R. Carpenter, W. de Vries, C. A. de Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, G. M. Mace,L. M. Persson, V. Ramanathan, B. Reyers, and S. Sörlin. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347 (1259855). DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855
Thornbush, M.J. 2017. Physical Geography and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability, 9: 2195. doi:10.3390/su9122195
Tortell, P.D. , 2020. Earth 2020: Science, society, and sustainability in the Anthropocene. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (16), 8683–8691 .
Tress, B., G.Tress, and G.Fry. 2005. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70 :177-191.
UN. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development Our Common Future. Geneva, Switzerland.
UNEP, 2015. Sustainable consumption and production; A Handbook for policymakers. ISBN: 978-92-807-3364-8
WCED e World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Weinzettel, J., E. G. Hertwich, G. P. Peters, K. Steen-Olsen and A.Galli. 2013. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change, 23: 433–438. doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010