تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

رویکرد علم سنجی به مطالعات تاب آوری بلایا در ایران

نویسندگان
دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
امروزه، مفهوم تاب آوری به یکی از اندیشه‌های محوری در مدیریت بلایا تبدیل شده است و به طور گسترده‌ای در حوزه‌های دانشگاهی و سیاست گذاران مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. مفهوم تاب آوری بلایا طی یک دهه گذشته وارد ادبیات علمی ایران شده است. رشته‌های مختلف در زمینه‌های شهری، روستایی و منطقه‌ای و همچنین در رابطه با مخاطرات مختلف آن را مفهوم‌پردازی و ارزیابی کرده‌اند. با وجود طیف گسترده­ای از مقالات منتشرشده مرتبط با تاب‌آوری بلایا تاکنون ساختار کلی چشم انداز فکری آن ناشناخته باقی مانده است. هدف کلی این پژوهش، ارائه ارزیابی از تولیدات علمی و ساختار فکری تاب آوری بلایا در ایران می‌باشد. در این پژوهش مقالات منتشر شده در حوزه تاب آوری بلایا با استفاده از روش‌های علم سنجی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. یافته‌های این پژوهش ماهیت چند بعدی و چند رشته‌ای مطالعات تاب آوری بلایا را نشان می­دهد. همچنین نتایج بیانگر آن است که نویسندگان با تعداد مقالات منتشرشده بیشتر، لزوماً تأثیر قابل توجهی در تحقیقات تاب آوری بلایا ندارند بلکه نویسندگان با مقالات منتشر شده کمتر ممکن است تأثیرات بیشتری در تحقیقات تاب آوری داشته باشند که این به شبکه ارتباطات آنها در تولیدات علمی بستگی دارد. همچنین باتوجه به تحلیل زمانی کلیدواژه‌های مقالات، فرایند تکاملی آن نشان می‌دهد که بررسی تاب‌آوری بلایا از موضوعاتی مانند ارزیابی تاب‌آوری و مفاهیم کلی به سوی تاب آوری اجتماعی، سرمایه اجتماعی و مدیریت بلایا حرکت کرده است. بنابراین طی این یک دهه، موضوعات پژوهشی تاب‌آوری بلایا به تدریج تغییر کرده­است. از شکاف‌های تحقیقاتی در زمینه تاب آوری بلایا در ایران می‌توان به موضوعات نادیده گرفتن بٌعد ذهنی تاب­آوری، تمرکز بیش از اندازه بر روی روش‌های کمی گرایانه، فقدان شواهد کافی از میزان تاب آوری گروه‌های سنی به خصوص سالخوردگان و کودکان در برابر بلایا، نابرابری جنسیتی و همچنین مناطق کمتر توسعه یافته، اشاره کرد. نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند به تقویت تحقیقات آینده در زمینه تاب­آوری بلایا و جهت­گیری آن کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Sciento-metrics Approach to Disaster Resilience Studies in Iran

نویسندگان English

Seyed Ali Badri
Siamak Tahmasbi
Bahram Hajari
University of Tehran
چکیده English

Investigation of Temperature and Precipitation Changes in the Seymarreh Basin by Using CMIP5 Series Climate Models



Abstract

Panel reports on climate change suggest that climate change around the world is most likely due to human factors. Temperature and precipitation are two important parameters in the climate of a region whose variations and fluctuations affect different areas such as agriculture, energy, tourism and so on. Seymareh basin is one of the most significant sub-basins of Karkheh. The purpose of this study is to predict the impact of climate change on precipitation and temperature of the Seymareh Basin in 2021-2040 period. These effects were analyzed at selected stations with uncertainties related to atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) of CMIP5 models under two scenarios of RCP45 and RCP85 through LARS-WG statistical model. Then the uncertainties of the models and scenarios were investigated by comparing the monthly outputs of the models by the coefficients of determination coefficient (R2) in the forthcoming period (2021-2040) with the base period (1980–2010). The root mean square error (RMSE) calculations presented the best model and scenarios for generating future temperature and precipitation data.

The Seymareh catchment is the largest and the main Karkheh sub-basin that covers parts of Kermanshah, Lorestan and Ilam provinces. The length of the largest river at the basin level to the site of the Seymareh Reservoir Dam is approximately 475 km, and the area of the basin is 26,700 km2. Geographic coordinates of the basin are from 33° 16 ́ 03 ̋to 34°59 ́ 29 ̋north latitudes and 46°6 ́9 ̋to ̋ 5 ́ 0 ° 49 Eastern longitudes, minimum basin height 698 m at the dam outlet and its maximum height 3,638 m. It is on the western highlands of Borujerd.

The information used in this study was obtained from the Meteorological Organization of the country. For this study, three synoptic stations of Kermanshah, Hamadan and Khorramabad, which had the highest statistical records and had appropriate distribution at basin level, were used. These data included daily and monthly temperature and precipitation information, and sunshine hours.

The LARS-WG fine-scale exponential model was proposed by Rasko et al., Semnoff and Barrow (1981). We used daily data at stations under current and future weather conditions. In order to select the best GCM model from the models mentioned above, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, precipitation and sunshine data were entered daily in the base period (1980–2010) and data were generated for five models under two scenarios of RCP45 and RCP85 for the period 2040–2021. The data were generated in 100 random series and the mean of required variables (minimum temperature, maximum temperature and rainfall) were extracted monthly in the period 2021-2040. Then, root mean square error (RMSE) and determination coefficient (R2) were used to evaluate the performance of the models and compare the results.

To ensure the models' ability to generate data in the coming period, computational data from the model and observational data at the stations under study should have been compared. The capability of the LARS-WG model in modeling the minimum temperature, maximum temperature, and radiation at the stations under study was completely consistent with the observed data. The model's ability to exemplify rainfall was also acceptable, however the highest modeling error was related to March rainfall.

By comparing the observed and produced data including monthly average precipitation, minimum and maximum temperatures through five mentioned models with their indices, the best model and scenario for future fabrication were determined. The results of this comparison showed that among the available models, HADGEM2-ES model under RCP 4.5 scenario had the best result for precipitation and HADGEM2-ES under RCP 8.5 scenario predicted the best result for maximum temperature. Determining the best model, precipitation data, minimum temperature and maximum temperature produced in the selected models and scenarios were analyzed to investigate the climate change temperature and precipitation for the future period.

The results of this study indicated that due to the wide range of output variations of different models and scenarios, by not taking into account the uncertainties of the models and scenarios can have a great impact on the results of the studies. It was also found in this study that the LARS-WG exponential model was capable of modeling precipitation data and baseline temperature in the study area, so that the radiation data, minimum and maximum temperatures were completely consistent with the data.

The observations are consistent and the models' ability to predict rainfall is very good and acceptable manner. In investigating the uncertainties caused by atmospheric general circulation models and existing scenarios, the best model to predict precipitation in the study area is HADGEM2-ES model under RCP 8.5 scenario, the best model for temperature estimation model HADGEM2-ES under RCP scenario No. 4.5.

The overall results of this study revealed that the average precipitation in the basin will decrease by 4.5% on average, while the minimum temperature will be 1.5° C and the maximum temperature will be 2.17° C. The highest increase will be due to the warmer months of the year. Notable are the disruptions of rainfall distribution and the high temperatures will have significantly negative consequences than rainfall reduction.



: Climate Change, Climate Scenarios, Uncertainty, LARS-WG, Seymareh.


کلیدواژه‌ها English

: resilience thinking
disaster resilience
Disaster management
Scientometrics
science mapping
co-word analysis
Iran
Alexander, D. E. 2013. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, 13:2707-2716. DOI: 10.5194/nhessd-1-1257-2013.
Alshehri, S. A., Rezgui, Y., and Li, H. 2015. Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster. Natural Hazards, 75: 2221-2245.
Belgrave, B. 2015. Resilience planning for natural hazards in New Zealand, a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Resource and Environmental Planning at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University).
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Herrera, F. 2011. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5: 146-166.
Cobo, M. J., Martínez, M. Á., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. 2015. 25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-based systems, 80: 3-13.
Demiroz, F., and Haase, T. W. 2019. The concept of resilience: a bibliometric analysis of the emergency and disaster management literature. Local Government Studies, 45:308-327.
Djalante, R., and Thomalla, F. 2011. Community resilience to natural hazards and climate change: a review of definitions and operational frameworks. Asian journal of environment and disaster management, 3: 339-355.
Fang, Y., Yin, J., and Wu, B. 2018. Climate change and tourism: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26: 108-126.
Lee, P. C., and Su, H. N. 2010. Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation, 12: 26-40.
Lima, C. O., and Bonetti, J. 2020. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events. Natural Hazards. Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 102:1589-1610. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03974-1.
Liu, J., Li, J., and Fan, C. 2020. A bibliometric study of pool fire related publications. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 63: 104030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104030
López-Bonilla, L. M., Reyes-Rodríguez, M. D. C., and López-Bonilla, J. M. 2020. Golf tourism and sustainability: Content analysis and directions for future research. Sustainability, 12: 3616. DOI: 10.3390/su12093616.
Maretti, M., Tontodimamma, A., and Biermann, P. 2019. Environmental and climate migrations: an overview of scientific literature using a bibliometric analysis. International Review of Sociology, 29: 142-158.
Niñerola, A., Sánchez-Rebull, M. V., and Hernández-Lara, A. B. 2019. Tourism research on sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 11: 1377.DOI: 10.3390/su11051377.
Parker, D. J. 2019. Disaster resilience–a challenged science. Environmental Hazards, 19: 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2019.1694857.
Peacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., Seitz, W. A., Merrell, W. J., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., ... and Stickney, R. 2010. Advancing resilience of coastal localities: Developing, implementing, and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: A final report. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, 1-148.
Rana, I. A. 2020. Disaster and climate change resilience: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50: 101839. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101839.
Rodríguez-López, N., Diéguez-Castrillón, M. I., and Gueimonde-Canto, A. 2019. Sustainability and tourism competitiveness in protected areas: State of art and future lines of research. Sustainability, 11: 6296.
Seguí-Amortegui, L., Clemente-Almendros, J. A., Medina, R., and Grueso Gala, M. 2019. Sustainability and Competitiveness in the Tourism Industry and Tourist Destinations: A Bibliometric Study. Sustainability, 11: 6351.
Serrano, L., Sianes, A., & Ariza-Montes, A. 2019. Using bibliometric methods to shed light on the concept of sustainable tourism. Sustainability, 11: 6964.
Sharifi, A. 2016. A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators, 69, 629-647.
Tiernan, A., Drennan, L., Nalau, J., Onyango, E., Morrissey, L., and Mackey, B. 2019. A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy design and practice, 2: 53-74.
Uekusa, S. 2018. Rethinking resilience: Bourdieu’s contribution to disaster research. Resilience, 6: 181-195.
Wang, J., & Liu, Z. 2014. A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines. Scientometrics, 101: 39-59.
Wang, L., Xue, X., Zhang, Y., and Luo, X. 2018. Exploring the emerging evolution trends of urban resilience research by scientometrics analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15: 2181.
Xue, X., Wang, L., and Yang, R. J. 2018. Exploring the science of resilience: critical review and bibliometric analysis. Natural Hazards, 90: 477-510.
Yoopetch, C., and Nimsai, S. 2019. Science mapping the knowledge base on sustainable tourism development, 1990–2018. Sustainability, 11: 3631.
Yu, L., Wang, G., and Marcouiller, D. W. 2019. A scientometrics review of pro-poor tourism research: Visualization and analysis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30: 75-88.