تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی

کمی‌سازی مکانی انتشار گاز دی اکسید کربن انسان‌زاد در مقیاس شهر با استفاده از روش "پایین به بالا" ( مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر اصفهان)

نویسندگان
دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان
چکیده
مصرف سوخت­های فسیلی در مناطق شهری، موجب انتشار مقادیر زیادی گاز گلخانه­ای به جو می­شود. بنابراین، مطالعه پایش میزان گاز دی اکسید کربن منتشر شده از مناطق شهری به یک موضوع مهم پژوهشی تبدیل شده ­است. هدف اصلی این مطالعه، کمی­سازی مکانی انتشار دی اکسیدکربن ناشی از احتراق سوخت­های فسیلی در شهر اصفهان می­باشد. بدین­منظور در پژوهش حاضر برای کمی­سازی میزان گاز دی­اکسیدکربن، بر اساس منابع تولید آن، در مقیاس شهری و درک تفاوت انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن در سطح شهر از روش "پایین به بالا" استفاده شد. در این روش میزان انتشار به تفکیک منابع مختلف مصرف انرژی محاسبه شده و سپس نقشه توزیع مکانی انتشار تهیه شد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد، میزان انتشار گاز دی اکسید کربن در فرآیند احتراق سوخت­های فسیلی در محدوده شهر اصفهان ۸۴/۱۳۸۵۵۵۲۵ تن در سال می­باشد که به تفکیک منابع احتراقی ثابت و متحرک بخش­های نیروگاهی، خانگی، تجاری، حمل­و ­نقل جاده‌ای و ریلی و حمل­و­نقل غیر­جاده‌ای (ماشین­‌آلات کشاورزی) به­ترتیب ۶۱/۵۰، ۷۸/۲۱، ۱۸/۱۷، ۹۲/۴، ۳۷/۴، و۱۴/۱ درصد از کل میزان گاز دی اکسید کربن سالانه را در شهر منتشر می­کنند. به­طور کلی، با به­کارگیری روش پایین به­بالا در نقشه­سازی انتشار دی­اکسید­کربن اقدامات کاهشی را می­توان در بخش­های مختلف به­صورت بسیار کارآمدتر به­کار گرفت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Space-based quantification of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in an urban area using “bottom-up” method (Case study: Isfahan Metropolitan)

نویسندگان English

Loghman Khodakarami
Saeid Pourmanafi
Alireza Soffianian
Ali Lotfi
Isfahan university of Technology
چکیده English

Space-based quantification of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in an urban area using “bottom-up” method

(Case study: Isfahan Metropolitan)

Abstract

Increasing consumption of fossil fuels in urban areas emits enormous amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Therefore, the study of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from urban areas has become an important research topic. The main purpose of this study is space-based quantification of carbon dioxide emissions driving from fossil fuel combustion in different source sectors in Isfahan. To achieve it, in the present study, the "bottom-up" method was used to quantify the carbon dioxide gas emission based on its production sources sectors. In this method, the amount of emission was measured distinctly for different sources of energy consumption and consequently the spatial distribution map the CO2 emission was generated. The results of this study revealed that the total amount of carbon dioxide emissions driving from fossil fuels is 13855525 tons per year in Isfahan. Separately stationary sectors of power plant, housing and commercial and mobile sources including road and railroad and existing agricultural machinery were responsible for emitting 50.61, 21.78, 17.18, 4.92, 4.37, and 1.14% of CO2, respectively. In conclusion, through applying the bottom-up method and CO2 emission distribution mapping based on different source sectors, mitigation measures can be applied more efficiently in urban planning.

Key words: Greenhouse gas (GHG), Fossil fuel combustion, Mobile and stationary source of energy consumption, climate change, Mitigation strategies

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Greenhouse gas (GHG)
Fossil fuel combustion
Mobile and stationary source of energy consumption
Climate Change
Mitigation strategies
1. Houghton, J., Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. 2001.
2. Lal, R., Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma, 2004. 123(1-2): p. 1-22.
3. Peters, R.W., Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change--An Overview. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2001. 20(1): p. A4.
4. Petit, J.-R., et al., Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature, 1999. 399(6735): p. 429.
5. Scott, N., et al., Monitoring land-use change effects on soil carbon in New Zealand: quantifying baseline soil carbon stocks. Environmental Pollution, 2002. 116: p. S167-S186.
6. Hamburg, S.P., et al., Common questions about climate change. United Nation Environment Programme, World Meteorology Organization, 1997.
7. Robinson, S.a., Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2020: p. e653.
8. Solomon, S., et al., Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Vol. 4. 2007: Cambridge university press.
9. Stern, N. and N.H. Stern, The economics of climate change: the Stern review. 2007: cambridge University press.
10. Wan, J.-Z., et al., Vulnerability of forest vegetation to anthropogenic climate change in China. Science of The Total Environment, 2018. 621: p. 1633-1641.
11. Hansen, J., et al., Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? arXiv preprint arXiv:0804.1126, 2008.
12. Oda, T., S. Maksyutov, and R.J. Andres, The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (CO2), version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global, monthly fossil-fuel CO2 gridded emission data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions. Earth system science data, 2018. 10(1): p. 87.
13. Churkina, G., Modeling the carbon cycle of urban systems. ecological modelling, 2008. 216(2): p. 107-113.
14. Grimm, N.B., et al., Global change and the ecology of cities. science, 2008. 319(5864): p. 756-760.
15. Gurney, K.R., et al., Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the building/street scale for a large US city. Environmental science & technology, 2012. 46(21): p. 12194-12202.
16. Brandon, P.S. and P. Lombardi, Evaluating sustainable development: in the Built Environment. 2009: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Fan, Y., et al., Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2006. 26(4): p. 377-395.
18. Turnbull, J.C., et al., Toward quantification and source sector identification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from an urban area: Results from the INFLUX experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2015. 120(1): p. 292-312.
19. Inoue, M., et al., Validation of XCO2 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 2013. 13(19): p. 9771-9788.
20. Maksyutov, S., et al., Regional CO2 flux estimates for 2009-2010 based on GOSAT and ground-based CO2 observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013. 13(18): p. 9351-9373.
21. Andres, R.J., et al., Monthly, global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2011. 63(3): p. 309-327.
22. Gurney, K.R., et al., Comparison of global downscaled versus bottom‐up fossil fuel CO2 emissions at the urban scale in four US urban areas. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2019. 124(5): p. 2823-2840.
23. Gurney, K.R., et al., The Hestia fossil fuel CO2 emissions data product for the Los Angeles megacity (Hestia-LA). Earth System Science Data, 2019. 11(3).
24. Oda, T. and S. Maksyutov, A very high-resolution (1 km? 1 km) global fossil fuel CO2 emission inventory derived using a point source database and satellite observations of nighttime lights. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011. 11(2): p. 543.
25. Change, I.P.O.C., 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan, 2006.
26. Herzog, T., World greenhouse gas emissions in 2005. World Resources Institute, 2009.
27. Oil, M.o., General Department of Health, Safety, Environment and Passive Defense, guide for calculating and reporting greenhouse gas emissions. 2018.
28. EPA, U., Center for Corporate Climate Leadership GHG Emission Factors Hub. 2017.
29. Manual, E.S., Energy Statistics Division of the International Energy Agency (IEA) in co-operation with the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat). Paris, France, 2005.
30. Shires, T.M., et al., Compendium of greenhouse gas emissions methodologies for the oil and natural gas industry. Prepared by URS Corporation for the American Petroleum Institute (API). API, Washington DC, 2009.
31. Eslami, M. and K. Faez. Automatic traffic monitoring from satellite images using artificial immune system. in Joint IAPR International Workshops on Statistical Techniques in Pattern Recognition (SPR) and Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition (SSPR). 2010. Springer.
32. Larsen, S.Ø., et al. Mapping road traffic conditions using high resolution satellite images. in Proceedings of GEOBIA. 2008.
33. Uddin, W., A. Ahmed, and M. Ali, Satellite Imagery Applications of Urban Road Inventory, Traffic Flow Attributes, and Road Capacity Assessment. International Journal of Recent Development in Engineering and Technology, 2013. 1(3).
34. Forouzandeh , K., Comparison of environmental effects of rail and road transport Silk Road, 2009. 102.